1953 Ford Monarch

Another Rusty Ride photo sent in, a 1953 Ford Monarch..

Community Feedback
Please Login to post a review OR create a free membership.
chromenfins
Mar 9, 2013

that is a nice car. it looks complete.

legratrodder
Dec 20, 2008

Bootleggers will drive anywhere.

mcyphert
Nov 15, 2008

timberrrrrrr!

turbo69stang
Feb 13, 2008

I love history, Someone should offer a H.S. class on auto history.

myhot56kustom
Sep 29, 2007

hey monarch,youre close but still not right.its a 54 monarch lucerne-just like mine.

55pickup
May 23, 2007

YEAHHH!....Thats what i meant to say.....sorry.

monarch
May 17, 2007

its not a merc, pontiac, cadillac, etc. Its a '53 monarch. this is a car made by ford of canada, more expensive than a merc, but a bit less than a lincoln. they are very rare, and its too bad that one went to the crusher. some people are just ignorant. if you disagree with me, check out my website, www.monarchsource.com, which is basically a historical guide to monarchs.

55pickup
May 6, 2007

Its a Merc for sure!

bearcuda
Mar 31, 2007

If anyone wants to know where what I believe to be a 53 Cadillac is, e-mail me.

ttrods
Mar 22, 2007

this car was a monarch , but I couldn't convince the auctioneer to sell the cars in the trees , so they went to the crusher , I even tried to deal with the crusher and he didn't care to talk to me ,thats why I save everything I can.. some people really piss me off .. scrap dealers are the worst

1954buick
Mar 12, 2007

55' Pontiac? Total guess, but I do know the Cadillac and Pontiac emblems to be similar. Who ownes it?

corvairscaddys
Feb 13, 2007

still needs to be restored what ever it is! doesn't appear to be a caddy, but that emblem looks similar

edhorner
Jan 10, 2007

It's definately not a Cadillac!

erclark128
Nov 23, 2006

lets try a Lincoln circa '52

mercman
Nov 16, 2006

nice car but its not a merc its a caddilac

robertob
Aug 10, 2006

LOOKS TO BE AROUND A 1954 MERCURY