1953 Ford Monarch
Another Rusty Ride photo sent in, a 1953 Ford Monarch..
Community Feedback
chromenfins  - March 9, 2013
that is a nice car. it looks complete.
legratrodder  - December 20, 2008
Bootleggers will drive anywhere.
mcyphert  - November 14, 2008
turbo69stang  - February 12, 2008
I love history, Someone should offer a H.S. class on auto history.
myhot56kustom  - September 28, 2007
hey monarch,youre close but still not right.its a 54 monarch lucerne-just like mine.
55pickup  - May 22, 2007
YEAHHH!....Thats what i meant to say.....sorry.
monarch  - May 16, 2007
its not a merc, pontiac, cadillac, etc. Its a '53 monarch. this is a car made by ford of canada, more expensive than a merc, but a bit less than a lincoln. they are very rare, and its too bad that one went to the crusher. some people are just ignorant. if you disagree with me, check out my website, www.monarchsource.com, which is basically a historical guide to monarchs.
55pickup  - May 5, 2007
Its a Merc for sure!
bearcuda  - March 30, 2007
If anyone wants to know where what I believe to be a 53 Cadillac is, e-mail me.
ttrods  - March 21, 2007
this car was a monarch , but I couldn't convince the auctioneer to sell the cars in the trees , so they went to the crusher , I even tried to deal with the crusher and he didn't care to talk to me ,thats why I save everything I can.. some people really piss me off .. scrap dealers are the worst
1954buick  - March 11, 2007
55' Pontiac? Total guess, but I do know the Cadillac and Pontiac emblems to be similar. Who ownes it?
corvairscaddys  - February 12, 2007
still needs to be restored what ever it is! doesn't appear to be a caddy, but that emblem looks similar
edhorner  - January 9, 2007
It's definately not a Cadillac!
erclark128  - November 22, 2006
lets try a Lincoln circa '52
mercman  - November 15, 2006
nice car but its not a merc its a caddilac
robertob  - August 9, 2006
Please Login to post a review OR create a free membership.
Created: May 02, 2008 By: oldride
Tags & Keywords