|
|
|
mcyphert: timberrrrrrr!
November 14, 2008 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
turbo69stang: I love history, Someone should offer a H.S. class on auto history.
February 13, 2008 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
myhot56kustom: hey monarch,youre close but still not right.its a 54 monarch lucerne-just like mine.
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
55pickup: YEAHHH!....Thats what i meant to say.....sorry.
May 23, 2007 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
monarch: its not a merc, pontiac, cadillac, etc. Its a '53 monarch. this is a car made by ford of canada, more expensive than a merc, but a bit less than a lincoln. they are very rare, and its too bad that one went to the crusher. some people are just ignorant. if you disagree with me, check out my website, www.monarchsource.com, which is basically a historical guide to monarchs.
May 17, 2007 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
55pickup: Its a Merc for sure!
May 6, 2007 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
bearcuda: If anyone wants to know where what I believe to be a 53 Cadillac is, e-mail me.
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ttrods: this car was a monarch , but I couldn't convince the auctioneer to sell the cars in the trees , so they went to the crusher , I even tried to deal with the crusher and he didn't care to talk to me ,thats why I save everything I can.. some people really piss me off .. scrap dealers are the worst
March 22, 2007 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1954buick: 55' Pontiac? Total guess, but I do know the Cadillac and Pontiac emblems to be similar. Who ownes it?
March 12, 2007 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
corvairscaddys: still needs to be restored what ever it is! doesn't appear to be a caddy, but that emblem looks similar
February 13, 2007 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
edhorner: It's definately not a Cadillac!
January 10, 2007 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
erclark128: lets try a Lincoln circa '52
November 23, 2006 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mercman: nice car but its not a merc its a caddilac
November 16, 2006 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
robertob: LOOKS TO BE AROUND A 1954 MERCURY
August 10, 2006 |
|
|
| |
